Satanic Anglican “City on a Hill Church” in Melbourne, Australia, explicitly excommunicated a Christian who is absolutely innocent in relation to all excommunications by other churches, and is absolutely innocent in relation to this particular satanic Anglican church in Melbourne. The Anglican “City on a Hill Church” falsely accused the absolutely innocent Christian of unusual behaviour necessitating excommunication. Also this Anglican church refused to answer why it previously excommunicated the Christian, and is still excommunicating the Christian.
(http://www.kyrkor.be/City-on-a-Hill-Church-Melbourne.htm)
(http://www.kyrkor.be/Devilish-Churches-in-Melbourne.htm)
(http://www.kyrkor.be/Also-satan-seems-to-be-an-Anglican.htm)
Anglican City on a Hill Church in Melbourne, Australia, explicitly excommunicated a Christian who is absolutely innocent in relation to all excommunications by hundreds of churches who have previously excommunicated the same Christian. Anglican City on a Hill Church in Melbourne provided no Biblical or reality-based reason for their previous decision to excommunicate, and this Anglican church refused to answer why it excommunicated Torsten now.
Inventing lies is a typical conduct of many pastors of churches, and this particular Anglican church’s invention of false accusations only confirm that this church is governed by typical pastors. This particular Anglican church invented the lie that Torsten’s behaviour is unusual, and that Torsten’s unusual behaviour justifies their excommunication of Torsten. The Anglican church declared “Given your unusual behaviour […] it is appropriate that we refuse your request to join our community.”
Torsten repeatedly asked why this Anglican church previously excommunicated Torsten 1˝ years ago, and why this Anglican church excommunicated Torsten now, but the Anglican church refused to provide any Biblical or reality-based reason. Instead, this Anglican church faulted Torsten of unspecified “words and actions” necessitating excommunication, as this Anglican church declared “Your words and actions have facilitated its necessity.”
Lying and falsely accusing are consistent behaviours of satan, and is also the characteristic conduct of many pastors of churches.
Malevolence, inhumanity, lying and slandering is primary conduct of most church leaders anywhere, and this particular satanic Anglican church accentuates this truth.
The email dialogue with satanic Anglican City on a Hill Church in Melbourne, Australia, is read chronologically from the bottom upwards beneath, with the most recent email at the top:
---------------------
Date: |
Tue, 23 Dec 2014 14:27:25 +1100 |
From: |
Nick Coombs <nickcoombs@cityonahill.com.au> |
To: |
torsten@nenzen.net |
Subject: |
Connecting at City on a Hill |
Hi Torsten,
Your Connect Form was passed onto me last week and I have been meaning to send an email since then. Naturally, given your unusual behaviour and publication of negative content relating to many churches around the world, it is appropriate that we refuse your request to join our community.
We have previously offered to meet with you, but you have ignored that request.
With that said, please discontinue sending emails to City on a Hill staff. This is the official stance of the pastors and will not change until you do.
This is an unfortunate situation and it is a great shame that your words and actions have facilitated its necessity.
For Jesus,
Nick
Date: |
Tue, 23 Dec 2014 13:11:19 +1100 |
From: |
Torsten <t@nenzen.org> |
To: |
guymason@cityonahill.com.au, Nick Coombs <nickcoombs@cityonahill.com.au>, Luke Nelson <lukenelson@cityonahill.com.au>, Emily Lancaster <emilylancaster@cityonahill.com.au>, info@cityonahill.com.au, she@cityonahill.com.au, chriscolgan@cityonahill.com.au, andrewgrills@cityonahill.com.au, geelong@cityonahill.com.au, alicearnott@cityonahill.com.au, davemay@cityonahill.com.au, sandycoates@cityonahill.com.au, martincoates@cityonahill.com.au, simonangus@cityonahill.com.au, nikmimilo@cityonahill.com.au |
Subject: |
Why excommunicated? |
Anglican City on a Hill Church.
Hello,
On Sunday Dec.7, 2014, I visited your 6pm service.
I filled in one of your connect forms with my contact detail, and on the form I asked a question. My question, as stated on that connect form, was “Are there occasions to socialise with also single Christian of the opposite gender in your church?” Because I know that (1) you are Anglican, and (2) you have previously excommunicated me without a real reason, I photographed the connect form prior to handing it over directly into the hand of one of your staff.
I identified a person who was wearing a staff badge, and asked the person if he was a staff of the church, to which he replies in the affirmative. I then handed the connect form over to that church staff. The church staff received it. I believe this church staff was either Chris Colgan or Nick Coombs.
Your church has yet not responded to the connect form request to be contacted regarding my question to your church.
Is your excommunication against me 1˝ years ago still valid? Why did you excommunicate me then? Why have you excommunicated me now?
Regards,
Torsten Nenzen
Date: |
Mon, 22 Dec 2014 12:12:54 +1100 |
From: |
Torsten <t@nenzen.org> |
To: |
guymason@cityonahill.com.au, Nick Coombs <nickcoombs@cityonahill.com.au>, Luke Nelson <lukenelson@cityonahill.com.au>, Emily Lancaster <emilylancaster@cityonahill.com.au>, info@cityonahill.com.au, she@cityonahill.com.au, chriscolgan@cityonahill.com.au, andrewgrills@cityonahill.com.au, geelong@cityonahill.com.au, alicearnott@cityonahill.com.au, davemay@cityonahill.com.au, sandycoates@cityonahill.com.au, martincoates@cityonahill.com.au, simonangus@cityonahill.com.au, nikmimilo@cityonahill.com.au |
Subject: |
Why excommunicated? |
Anglican City on a Hill Church.
Hello,
Two weeks ago on Sunday Dec.7, 2014, I visited your 6pm service.
I filled in one of your connect forms with my contact detail, and on the form I asked a question. My question, as stated on that connect form, was “Are there occasions to socialise with also single Christian of the opposite gender in your church?” Because I know that (1) you are Anglican, and (2) you have previously excommunicated me without a real reason, I photographed the connect form prior to handing it over directly into the hand of one of your staff.
I identified a person who was wearing a staff badge, and asked the person if he was a staff of the church, to which he replies in the affirmative. I then handed the connect form over to that church staff. The church staff received it. I believe this church staff was either Chris Colgan or Nick Coombs.
Your church has yet not responded to the connect form request to be contacted regarding my question to your church.
Is your excommunication against me 1˝ years ago still valid? Why did you excommunicate me then? Why have you excommunicated me now?
Regards,
Torsten Nenzen
Date: |
Sun, 21 Dec 2014 01:06:04 +1100 |
From: |
torsten@nenzen.net <nenzen@nenzen.org> |
To: |
guymason@cityonahill.com.au, Nick Coombs <nickcoombs@cityonahill.com.au>, Luke Nelson <lukenelson@cityonahill.com.au>, Emily Lancaster <emilylancaster@cityonahill.com.au>, info@cityonahill.com.au, she@cityonahill.com.au, chriscolgan@cityonahill.com.au, andrewgrills@cityonahill.com.au, geelong@cityonahill.com.au, alicearnott@cityonahill.com.au, davemay@cityonahill.com.au, sandycoates@cityonahill.com.au, martincoates@cityonahill.com.au, simonangus@cityonahill.com.au, nikmimilo@cityonahill.com.au |
Subject: |
Why excommunicated? |
Anglican City on a Hill Church.
Hello,
Two weeks ago on Sunday Dec.7, 2014, I visited your 6pm service.
I filled in one of your connect forms with my contact detail, and on the form I asked a question. My question, as stated on that connect form, was “Are there occasions to socialise with also single Christian of the opposite gender in your church?” Because I know that (1) you are Anglican, and (2) you have previously excommunicated me without a real reason, I photographed the connect form prior to handing it over directly into the hand of one of your staff.
I identified a person who was wearing a staff badge, and asked the person if he was a staff of the church, to which he replies in the affirmative. I then handed the connect form over to that church staff. The church staff received it. I believe this church staff was either Chris Colgan or Nick Coombs.
Your church has yet not responded to the connect form request to be contacted regarding my question to your church.
Is your excommunication against me 1˝ years ago still valid? Why did you excommunicate me then? Why have you excommunicated me now?
Regards,
Torsten Nenzen
Photograph of the church’s communication card which was handed to a clergy inside the Anglican church, on Sunday Dec.7, 2014: http://www.kyrkor.be/City-On-A-Hill-Chuch-Melbourne-2014-12-07.jpg